Asbestos
products are marketed to developing countries as cheap and durable products. Asbestos-containing
products thought of as a poor person’s building material. It is cheaper than
other materials so it makes home building and even ownership more attainable to
a person or a family who would not have been able to afford another kind of
shelter. Furthermore, materials made with asbestos are more durable.
However,
the health risks are often downplayed and are rarely promoted. People who do
not know about the health risks associated with asbestos exposure and who live
in poverty so they cannot afford a safer building material do not have the
opportunity to protect their health. Moreover, chrysotile asbestos is said to
be the ‘safer’ choice than its alternatives, which has generally unstudied
consequences, and other varieties of asbestos, like amphibole, despite that the
World Health Organization says that all kinds of asbestos are carcinogenic.
Why sell to the developing
world?
Asbestos
producing countries need to market asbestos to countries where it has not yet
been banned or its consumption limited. Asbestos is currently banned in over
fifty countries including the European Union, many of which are located in the
developed world or are medium-income countries. Most other developed countries
and increasingly more developing countries strictly control asbestos.
Developing
countries are then the most accessible market to the asbestos industry. India,
for instance, is one of the largest consumers of asbestos in the world.
Health consequences due to
lack of laws and enforcement as well as a lack of capacity to create and
enforce new laws
Sadly,
many developing countries do not have laws that protect workers effectively.
Even if they do have laws, they
might not be enforced, which puts people, especially those who work with
asbestos, at risk of being exposed. According to the WHO,
asbestos-related cancers are the leading cause of occupational cancer globally
with an estimated 125 million people being exposed to asbestos each year in
their workplace.
The
people who work in factories that process imported raw asbestos are also in
danger of asbestos exposure. If workers are impoverished, they will not speak
out against working conditions for fear of losing their jobs.
And
if they become ill with an asbestos-related disease such as asbestosis, they
will keep working in the toxic environment because they require the income to
support their families and pay for their medicine. Continuing to work with
asbestos will only make them sicker, though. Eventually, they will not be able
to work anymore so they will lose that income. This will mean they will not be
able to afford medicine and without the income from their job they will be even
more marginalized.
Mining operations have
grown in developing and middle-income countries
Before
2011, when its last asbestos mines were closed, Canada was a major exporter of
asbestos globally. The main importers of Canada’s asbestos were developing countries
like Brazil and India. These countries are still importing asbestos today from
producers like Kazakhstan, Russia, Zimbabwe, and China whose asbestos mines
still operate today.
While
the closing of the Canadian asbestos mines were a win for the
anti-asbestos movement here, other asbestos-producing countries benefitted financially
from the move by picking up where the Canadian asbestos industry left off.
Not Worth The Risk
The
asbestos industry has a great financial interest in continuing the mining and
processing of the mineral. Advocacy groups against asbestos argue that this is
why asbestos has still not yet been banned in many countries. Even in Canada and the United States asbestos is not banned outright, just controlled.
Even
though asbestos is fireproof and has high tensile strength, it is not worth
using (even with precautions) because it is like poison and has deadly
consequences. When these consequences are ignored or downplayed, though, some
only see asbestos’ profit-making ability.
Resources:
CBC The National. (2010). Canada’s Ugly
Secret. Retrieved July 2013 from
http://www.cbc.ca/thenational/indepthanalysis/story/2010/06/28/national-asbestos.html.
CBC News. (2011). Asbestos Mining Stop
For The First Time In 150 Years. Retireved July 2013 from
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/11/24/asbestos-shutdown.html.
Lemen, Richard A. (ND). Smoke and
Mirrors: Chrysotile Asbestos Is Good For You – Illusion And Confusion But Not
Fact. Retrieved July 2013 from
http://worldasbestosreport.org/articles/iatb/page16-20.pdf.
McCulloch J. and Tweedale G. (2009). Defending
the Indefensible, The Global Asbestos Industry and its Fight for Survival.
Oxford University Press.
World Health Organization. (2006).
Elimination of Asbestos-Related Diseases. Retrieved July from
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2006/WHO_SDE_OEH_06.03_eng.pdf.
No comments:
Post a Comment